|
|
|
±èÀ±¹Ì ( Kim Yun-Mi ) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú
¹Ú±¤¿Á ( Park Kwang-Ok ) - ¼¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ÀåÇý·É ( Jang Hae-Ryung ) - Á¦ÀϺ´¿ø Á¤ÀºÀÚ ( Jung Eun-Ja ) - ºÐ´ç¼¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ±èÁö¼ö ( Kim Ji-Soo ) - »óÁö´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú ±èÀº¿µ ( Kim Eun-Young ) - µ¿¾Æ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare maternal perceptions between two groups of postpartum women, women who chose to have their babies room-in and women who did not (non rooming-in group).
Methods: Data collection was conducted in 37 hospitals from August 10 to September 20, 2008. The participants were 209 mothers opting for rooming-in and 128 mothers for non rooming-in. The women completed a questionnaire which included the Edinburgh postpartum depression scale, maternal attachment inventory, and postpartum self-evaluation questionnaire.
Results: There were significant differences in education level, income and antenatal education between the rooming-in and non rooming-in groups. The rooming-in group also showed higher levels of satisfaction with medical services. More important, the rate of breast feeding for the rooming-in group was higher than for the non rooming-in group. There was no difference between the two groups for postpartum depression, maternal attachment and mothers¡¯ confidence with infant care tasks.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that rooming-in system has more advantages compared to non rooming-in and that it can help to promote breast feeding. The authors recommend that the rooming-in system be expanded nationwide. The results of this research can be used to assist the development of future rooming-in system expansion strategy.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
¸ðÀÚµ¿½Ç, ¸ðÀÚº°½Ç, ½Å»ý¾Æ½Ç, »ê¸ð
Rooming-in cares, Breastfeeding, Postpartum women
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|